🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has declared it is claiming damages valued at $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This move is a direct response by the Kremlin regarding plans to use immobilized Russian sovereign funds to aid Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

According to accounts in local news outlets, the monetary authority initiated a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This figure corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

EU leaders will determine later this week regarding a plan to use approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. The proposal involves providing Ukraine with a large loan to finance its defence and economic needs.

The vast majority of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the primary keeper for the Kremlin's frozen financial reserves.

Divergent Legal Views

European Union authorities have maintained that their proposal is on solid legal ground. Their position rests on the principle that title of the state assets remains with Russia, even though it was immobilized in European jurisdictions shortly after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any use of the funds as theft. Authorities have warned of retaliatory measures, such as confiscating European corporate assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a key role in peace negotiations, stated on X that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its funds. He warned that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Strategic Positioning

With statements seen as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the assets plan as "a severe assault on the right to ownership and the global financial system created by the United States."

The clearing house refused to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. It has in the past stated it is contending with over 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Enforcement Challenges

While courts in European nations are unlikely to recognize judgments from Russian tribunals, analysts expect Moscow to pursue implementation in countries with stronger ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, provided that relevant assets can be identified," stated a legal expert from an international firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials said they are developing measures to discourage other nations from aiding any Russian lawsuits against EU entities. Additionally, they are designing safeguards to shield EU countries with investments in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the detailed plan, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would stay unaffected.

Kyiv would only be obligated to repay the money if and when Russia agreed to pay reparations for the immense damage inflicted during the nearly four-year war.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This entails joint EU debt issuance to secure a loan, using unused funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, requires full agreement among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, said the reparations loan as "the most credible solution" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is based on the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is equally significant," she stated. "It also delivers a clear signal that when you do all this destruction to another country, you have to pay for the reparations."