🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.